Showing 221 - 240 results of 17,928 for search 'significant ((((gap decrease) OR (((step decrease) OR (teer decrease))))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.31s Refine Results
  1. 221
  2. 222
  3. 223

    Table 2 - by Rosanna Mary Rooney (17595801)

    Published 2024
    “…Despite a global decrease over the last 30 years, youth crime remains prevalent. …”
  4. 224

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  5. 225

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  6. 226

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  7. 227

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  8. 228

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  9. 229

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  10. 230

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  11. 231

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  12. 232
  13. 233
  14. 234
  15. 235

    Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Enabled Closed-Loop Recycling of Thermally Modified Polymer Membrane by Ching Yoong Loh (17863097)

    Published 2025
    “…Thermal and mechanical characterizations confirmed the great stability of the membranes, with the Diels–Alder reaction enabling depolymerization and reformation of the network without causing significant degradation. Additionally, the RFMs were recycled the third time, maintaining the fluxes (752 to 823 LMH) from the previous generation with a slight decrease in separation efficiency in dichloromethane-water emulsion separation (98.3 to 97%). …”
  16. 236

    Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Enabled Closed-Loop Recycling of Thermally Modified Polymer Membrane by Ching Yoong Loh (17863097)

    Published 2025
    “…Thermal and mechanical characterizations confirmed the great stability of the membranes, with the Diels–Alder reaction enabling depolymerization and reformation of the network without causing significant degradation. Additionally, the RFMs were recycled the third time, maintaining the fluxes (752 to 823 LMH) from the previous generation with a slight decrease in separation efficiency in dichloromethane-water emulsion separation (98.3 to 97%). …”
  17. 237

    Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Enabled Closed-Loop Recycling of Thermally Modified Polymer Membrane by Ching Yoong Loh (17863097)

    Published 2025
    “…Thermal and mechanical characterizations confirmed the great stability of the membranes, with the Diels–Alder reaction enabling depolymerization and reformation of the network without causing significant degradation. Additionally, the RFMs were recycled the third time, maintaining the fluxes (752 to 823 LMH) from the previous generation with a slight decrease in separation efficiency in dichloromethane-water emulsion separation (98.3 to 97%). …”
  18. 238

    Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Enabled Closed-Loop Recycling of Thermally Modified Polymer Membrane by Ching Yoong Loh (17863097)

    Published 2025
    “…Thermal and mechanical characterizations confirmed the great stability of the membranes, with the Diels–Alder reaction enabling depolymerization and reformation of the network without causing significant degradation. Additionally, the RFMs were recycled the third time, maintaining the fluxes (752 to 823 LMH) from the previous generation with a slight decrease in separation efficiency in dichloromethane-water emulsion separation (98.3 to 97%). …”
  19. 239

    Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Enabled Closed-Loop Recycling of Thermally Modified Polymer Membrane by Ching Yoong Loh (17863097)

    Published 2025
    “…Thermal and mechanical characterizations confirmed the great stability of the membranes, with the Diels–Alder reaction enabling depolymerization and reformation of the network without causing significant degradation. Additionally, the RFMs were recycled the third time, maintaining the fluxes (752 to 823 LMH) from the previous generation with a slight decrease in separation efficiency in dichloromethane-water emulsion separation (98.3 to 97%). …”
  20. 240

    Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design. by Antonio Marty Quispe (12574259)

    Published 2025
    “…Analysis followed a stepped-wedge mixed-effects negative binomial model adjusting for clustering and time trends. …”