Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
461
-
462
Mean uncertainty of <i>boro</i> rice yields estimated by random forest model from 2002–2021.
Published 2024Subjects: -
463
Data for Figs 8A–8H, 9A–9K, 10A–10I.
Published 2024“…In <i>vivo</i> experiments further showed that PRV UL4 (<sup>132</sup>DVAADAAAEAAAAE<sup>145</sup>) mutated strain (PRV-UL4<sup>mut</sup>) infection did not lead to a significant decrease in viral titers at 12 h. p. i, but it induced lower levels of IL-1β, IL-18, and GSDMD-NT, which led to an alleviated inflammatory infiltration and pathological damage in the lungs and brains, and a lower death rate compared with wild-type PRV strain infection. …”
-
464
-
465
-
466
-
467
-
468
-
469
-
470
-
471
-
472
-
473
-
474
-
475
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
476
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
477
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
478
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
479
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
480
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”