Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
261
-
262
-
263
-
264
-
265
-
266
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
-
271
-
272
-
273
-
274
-
275
Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features.
Published 2025“…<b>(B)</b> Volcano plot highlighting the significantly different metabolomic features. The red dots represent the features with significantly increased intensity, and the purple dots represent the features with significantly decreased intensity. …”
-
276
-
277
-
278
Effect of Molecular Structure on the B3LYP-Computed HOMO–LUMO Gap: A Structure −Property Relationship Using Atomic Signatures
Published 2025“…The use of atomic Signatures as molecular descriptors successfully inferred correlations between different structural motifs and <i>E</i><sub>gap</sub>. The atomic fragments containing π-bonds in various aromatic compounds were found to be the most significant atomic Signatures, explaining nearly 50% of the variance in the data, with regression coefficients that decreased <i>E</i><sub>gap</sub>. …”
-
279
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
280