Search alternatives:
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
601
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
602
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
603
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
604
-
605
Decreased synthesis of VCAM-1, tubulin and dynein proteins in the heart of mice stimulated with EVs (green) or ICs (blue).
Published 2025“…The values represent the mean ± SEM, with significance set at p < 0.05 (*).…”
-
606
-
607
-
608
-
609
S1 File -
Published 2024“…Compared with LPS treatment alone, BA significantly mitigated the reduction in the TEER, decreased FD-4 flux permeability, increased the mRNA expression of ZO-1 and Occludin, and normalized the distribution of ZO-1 and Occludin in Caco2 cells. …”
-
610
Experimental treatments and groups.
Published 2024“…Compared with LPS treatment alone, BA significantly mitigated the reduction in the TEER, decreased FD-4 flux permeability, increased the mRNA expression of ZO-1 and Occludin, and normalized the distribution of ZO-1 and Occludin in Caco2 cells. …”
-
611
Primers for RT-qPCR.
Published 2024“…Compared with LPS treatment alone, BA significantly mitigated the reduction in the TEER, decreased FD-4 flux permeability, increased the mRNA expression of ZO-1 and Occludin, and normalized the distribution of ZO-1 and Occludin in Caco2 cells. …”
-
612
Description of the warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
613
Flow chart of the study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
614
Summary statistics of the sample.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
615
Product attributes and attribute levels.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
616
Dataset used in this study.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
617
Definitions of the variables.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
618
A sample choice question without a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
619
A sample choice question with a warning label.
Published 2024“…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
-
620