Showing 2,241 - 2,260 results of 18,571 for search 'significant ((((greater decrease) OR (((we decrease) OR (a decrease))))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.61s Refine Results
  1. 2241

    S2 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  2. 2242

    Participant characteristics (<i>n</i> = 34). by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  3. 2243

    S4 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  4. 2244

    S6 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  5. 2245
  6. 2246
  7. 2247
  8. 2248

    Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  9. 2249

    Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  10. 2250

    Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  11. 2251

    Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  12. 2252

    Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  13. 2253

    The technical route of the study. by Hongliang Zou (20707270)

    Published 2025
    “…The highest root-mean-square error recorded was 2.72m in five sequences from a multi-modal multi-scene ground robot dataset, which was significantly lower than competing approaches. …”
  14. 2254

    Point cloud fusion instance effect. by Hongliang Zou (20707270)

    Published 2025
    “…The highest root-mean-square error recorded was 2.72m in five sequences from a multi-modal multi-scene ground robot dataset, which was significantly lower than competing approaches. …”
  15. 2255

    Experimental results in the SubT-MRS dataset. by Hongliang Zou (20707270)

    Published 2025
    “…The highest root-mean-square error recorded was 2.72m in five sequences from a multi-modal multi-scene ground robot dataset, which was significantly lower than competing approaches. …”
  16. 2256
  17. 2257
  18. 2258
  19. 2259
  20. 2260