Search alternatives:
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
4721
-
4722
-
4723
-
4724
-
4725
Continuing evolution of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses of clade 2.3.2.1a G2 genotype in domestic poultry of Bangladesh during 2018–2021
Published 2024“…Consequently, antigenic analysis revealed a significant loss of cross-reactivity between viruses from different host species and periods. …”
-
4726
-
4727
-
4728
-
4729
-
4730
-
4731
-
4732
-
4733
-
4734
Seasonal variability in the secondary metabolite content of <i>Commelina</i> species.
Published 2024Subjects: -
4735
Altitudinal variability in the secondary metabolite content of <i>Commelina</i> species.
Published 2024Subjects: -
4736
-
4737
-
4738
-
4739
Experiment setting.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
-
4740
Experimental flow.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”