Search alternatives:
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7181
-
7182
-
7183
Table 1_Analysis of the microbiota of pregnant women in relation to weight gain during pregnancy – a pilot study.docx
Published 2025“…However, in both sites none difference was found to be statistically significant after p-value correction.</p>Conclusions<p>Despite small sample size, we demonstrated slight trends in microbiota composition between groups. …”
-
7184
-
7185
-
7186
-
7187
-
7188
Characteristics of the study participants.
Published 2025“…A significant time effect was also observed for PPT, with an increase in the right-side threshold (p = 0.0186; d = 0.58). …”
-
7189
-
7190
-
7191
-
7192
-
7193
-
7194
-
7195
-
7196
MGPC module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
7197
Comparative experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
7198
Pruning experiment.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
7199
Parameter setting table.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
7200
DTADH module.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”