Showing 501 - 520 results of 18,076 for search 'significant ((((side decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (((step decrease) OR (we decrease))))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 501
  2. 502
  3. 503

    <i>Aedes aegypti</i> database from SAGO traps. by Jesús A. Aguilar-Durán (9931967)

    Published 2025
    “…IVM treatment reduced the number of females per trap per week from 3.29 ± 0.24 to 2.41 ± 0.20 (33.7% reduction), AGO from 1.58 ± 0.17 to 0.25 ± 0.05 (85.2% reduction), and AGO + IVM from 1.49 ± 0.17 to 0.53 ± 0.08 (67.78% reduction), based on Henderson’s formula. We observed a non-significant increase in the control area (no treatment provided) in the mosquito populations, increasing from 2.94 ± 0.24 in the pretreatment period to 3.25 ± 0.28 of the post treatment period.…”
  4. 504
  5. 505

    Fig 1 - by Farshid Maleki (20521649)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  6. 506
  7. 507
  8. 508
  9. 509

    Fig 5 - by Farshid Maleki (20521649)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  10. 510
  11. 511
  12. 512
  13. 513
  14. 514

    Subcellular Mechanical Imaging of Erythrocytes with Optically Correlated Scanning Ion Conductance Microscopy by Yunong Wang (10358970)

    Published 2025
    “…Comparison of normal and diamide-treated red blood cells shows a significant increase in cell stiffness and a concomitant decrease in deformability, clearly demonstrating the quantitative abilities of the correlative approach taken here for stiffness measurements of intact cellular samples.…”
  15. 515

    Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  16. 516

    Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  17. 517

    Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  18. 518

    Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  19. 519

    Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”
  20. 520

    Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The intervention group showed a significant decrease in anxiety (t =  11.906, P <  0.001) and depression scores (t =  14.991, P <  0.001), as well as PSQI scores (t =  7.055, P <  0.001), and increased FertiQoL scores (t =  -2.828, P <  0.001). …”