Snail count data. by Roland Proud (11764892)

Subjects:

Human parasitology infection intensity data. by Roland Proud (11764892)

Subjects:

Human parasitology prevalence data. by Roland Proud (11764892)

Subjects:

Tornado diagram showing the results of a one-way sensitivity analysis conducted for the scenario with vaccination. by Albertus Constantijn Sloof (20405090)

PCoA plot analysis for dissimilarity. by Yu Sang Choi (22656230)

<i>SLC2A2</i> is associated with IGF1R pathways differentiation. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Changes in <i>SLC2A2</i> gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on its stage and correlation with oncofetal and stemness genes. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Primers used for qPCR gene expression analysis. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

The IGF1R pathway is upregulated following <i>slc2a2</i> knockdown in HepG2 cells and zebrafish embryos. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Gene expression dynamics during liver development. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Protein levels of GLUT2 were analyzed by western blotting. by Yejin Kim (740789)

Subjects:

Fig 3 - by Micha Keller (11312748)

“…<p>Estimated marginal means (± SE) of momentary frequency of highest amplitude (MFHA; A.1-A.3) as well as amplitudes (B.1-B.3) for each intervention, LF, IM, and HF frequency bands, and each section. …”

S1 File - A novel yeast-derived aldehyde-reducing compound MF001 protects against alcohol-induced liver damage by Eun-Ho Lee (2696890)

Mean mesenteric, retroperitoneal, pericardial, and total visceral adipose tissue weights (in grams) upon completion of the experiment. by Elsie D. Oduor (22521785)

Data for Figs S1A–S1C, S2A, S2C–S2L, S3C–S3F, S4A–S4J. by Xiaohua Zhang (350570)

This diagram summarizes the main steps of our study, including data sourcing from the GBD 2021 database, stratified processing by disease stage, age, and sex, application of EAPC a... by Xinyue Qi (9637055)

Data_GDP/ Ndvi. by Qianhong Mao (22305184)

“…The findings include the following: (1) from 2010 to 2022, the spatial structure of urban-fringe-rural areas in Suzhou changed considerably, with 69.04% rural areas transformed into fringe areas, and 50.83% fringe areas developed into urban areas; (2) based on transition process, the region was further divided into urban maintenance, urban expansion, fringe maintenance, fringe expansion, and rural retention areas. Most of the mean value of ESs showed a gradient increasing differences along urban-fringe-rural, while the greatest decrease occurs in fringe expansion and urban expansion areas; and (3) interactions for changes in ES pairs also more closely linked in these two regions, with synergies dominating. …”

Flow chart of the study. by Qianhong Mao (22305184)

“…The findings include the following: (1) from 2010 to 2022, the spatial structure of urban-fringe-rural areas in Suzhou changed considerably, with 69.04% rural areas transformed into fringe areas, and 50.83% fringe areas developed into urban areas; (2) based on transition process, the region was further divided into urban maintenance, urban expansion, fringe maintenance, fringe expansion, and rural retention areas. Most of the mean value of ESs showed a gradient increasing differences along urban-fringe-rural, while the greatest decrease occurs in fringe expansion and urban expansion areas; and (3) interactions for changes in ES pairs also more closely linked in these two regions, with synergies dominating. …”

Example of manual identification. by Qianhong Mao (22305184)

“…The findings include the following: (1) from 2010 to 2022, the spatial structure of urban-fringe-rural areas in Suzhou changed considerably, with 69.04% rural areas transformed into fringe areas, and 50.83% fringe areas developed into urban areas; (2) based on transition process, the region was further divided into urban maintenance, urban expansion, fringe maintenance, fringe expansion, and rural retention areas. Most of the mean value of ESs showed a gradient increasing differences along urban-fringe-rural, while the greatest decrease occurs in fringe expansion and urban expansion areas; and (3) interactions for changes in ES pairs also more closely linked in these two regions, with synergies dominating. …”

Data_soil. by Qianhong Mao (22305184)

“…The findings include the following: (1) from 2010 to 2022, the spatial structure of urban-fringe-rural areas in Suzhou changed considerably, with 69.04% rural areas transformed into fringe areas, and 50.83% fringe areas developed into urban areas; (2) based on transition process, the region was further divided into urban maintenance, urban expansion, fringe maintenance, fringe expansion, and rural retention areas. Most of the mean value of ESs showed a gradient increasing differences along urban-fringe-rural, while the greatest decrease occurs in fringe expansion and urban expansion areas; and (3) interactions for changes in ES pairs also more closely linked in these two regions, with synergies dominating. …”