Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7701
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7702
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7703
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7704
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7705
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7706
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7707
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7708
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7709
Funnel plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7710
-
7711
Image 3_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7712
Image 4_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7713
Image 2_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7714
Image 1_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7715
Table 2_Factors influencing bone mineral density in hyperparathyroidism phenotypes: a prospective study.xlsx
Published 2025“…Additionally, a greater postoperative drop in PTH was associated with larger BMD gains at the spine (SD 0.07; mean 0.03) and left femur bone (SD 0.06; mean 0.02). …”
-
7716
Table 1_Factors influencing bone mineral density in hyperparathyroidism phenotypes: a prospective study.xlsx
Published 2025“…Additionally, a greater postoperative drop in PTH was associated with larger BMD gains at the spine (SD 0.07; mean 0.03) and left femur bone (SD 0.06; mean 0.02). …”
-
7717
Cyanoamino acid metabolism.
Published 2025“…In KEGG of 8d, the objective genes were drastically enriched cyanoamino acid metabolism, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, etc. We further constructed the pathway for cyanide amino acid metabolism under B stress and found that miR408c-5p targeted the gene controlling β -glucosidase 18, and the expression level was notably decreased. …”
-
7718
Expression analysis of miRNAs by qRT-PCR.
Published 2025“…In KEGG of 8d, the objective genes were drastically enriched cyanoamino acid metabolism, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, etc. We further constructed the pathway for cyanide amino acid metabolism under B stress and found that miR408c-5p targeted the gene controlling β -glucosidase 18, and the expression level was notably decreased. …”
-
7719
-
7720
Modulation of performance during learning.
Published 2025“…The ‘W<sub>exp</sub>’ value shows the weight of the exponential component in each distribution. (B) A longitudinal comparison of the average exponential fit weight between WT and zQ175 mice reveals that while WT mice show a decreasing trend, indicating a shift towards longer duration (“timed”) trials, zQ175 mice maintain a consistently high exponential weight, demonstrating no significant change over time (b; RM two-way ANOVA, genotype p = 0.0106 F(1, 22) = 7.795, days p < 0.0001 F(5.262, 115.4) = 7.616, interaction p < 0.0001 F(57, 1250) = 2.834). …”