Showing 1,521 - 1,540 results of 18,222 for search 'significant ((((step decrease) OR (((we decrease) OR (greater decrease))))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.65s Refine Results
  1. 1521
  2. 1522
  3. 1523
  4. 1524
  5. 1525
  6. 1526

    S3 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  7. 1527

    S5 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  8. 1528

    S1 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  9. 1529

    S2 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  10. 1530

    Participant characteristics (<i>n</i> = 34). by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  11. 1531

    S4 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  12. 1532

    S6 Table - by Yong-Rae Kim (19797278)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, the vigor score was significantly increased while total mood disturbance was significantly decreased when viewing the wood-attached ECD. …”
  13. 1533

    Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  14. 1534

    Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  15. 1535

    Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  16. 1536

    Results of RF algorithm screening factors. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  17. 1537

    Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  18. 1538
  19. 1539
  20. 1540