Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1401
-
1402
-
1403
-
1404
-
1405
-
1406
-
1407
-
1408
-
1409
-
1410
Effect of fasudil on clinical outcomes of pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2024“…</p> <p>Inclusion of 3269 Group-3 PH patients demonstrated that Fasudil increased effective events, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) and arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), and decreased mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP); Inclusion of 197 Group-2 PH patients suggested that Fasudil increased 6MWD and PaO<sub>2</sub>, and decreased PASP. …”
-
1411
-
1412
-
1413
Structure diagram of ensemble model.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1414
Fitting formula parameter table.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1415
Test plan.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1416
Fitting surface parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1417
Model generalisation validation error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1418
Empirical model prediction error analysis.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1419
Fitting curve parameters.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”
-
1420
Test instrument.
Published 2024“…Comparative analysis highlights the significant enhancement in prediction accuracy achieved by the proposed ensemble model over single machine learning models, with root mean square error (RMSE) values below 0.05 and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) values remaining under 2.5% in both frozen and unfrozen states. …”