Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
3441
Statistical analysis of the AUC measurement.
Published 2025“…The mean AUC decreased in both samples.</p> <p>(TIF)</p>…”
-
3442
Characterization of <i>S. japonicus pab</i>2Δ.
Published 2025“…Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed unpaired <i>t</i>-test (*<i>p</i> < 0.05, **<i>p</i> < 0.01, and ***<i>p</i> < 0.005; N.S.: not significant). …”
-
3443
Baseline measures of participants.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Music Performance Anxiety, a subset of social anxiety disorder (SAD), can significantly impede the lives of professional voice users (PVUs). …”
-
3444
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Music Performance Anxiety, a subset of social anxiety disorder (SAD), can significantly impede the lives of professional voice users (PVUs). …”
-
3445
-
3446
Barnes maze testing in animals on post-injury day 1.
Published 2025“…(A) Briefly, animals received acclimation and then four days of acquisition with expected decreasing mean times to escape. (B) On post-injury day 1, animals received a probe test, and escape latencies for each group are shown. …”
-
3447
Rank of mutation fitness.
Published 2025“…Retrospective validation demonstrated that CoVPF achieved 20.7% higher accuracy compared to previous study. Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. …”
-
3448
Key modeling details for CoVPF and controls.
Published 2025“…Retrospective validation demonstrated that CoVPF achieved 20.7% higher accuracy compared to previous study. Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. …”
-
3449
Isolation and characterization of the <i>clr4–1</i> mutant strain.
Published 2025“…Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, with WT as the reference sample (*<i>p</i> < 0.05 and **<i>p</i> < 0.01; N.S.: not significant).…”
-
3450
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3451
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3452
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3453
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3454
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3455
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3456
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3457
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3458
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3459
The six most abundant miRNAs within AdMSC-EVs.
Published 2025“…We next demonstrated that AdMSC-EVs accelerated the migration of LECs in a scratch assay, whereas the proliferation of LECs was decreased by AdMSC-EVs in the cell proliferation assay. …”
-
3460
Disruption of OGG1-RNA interaction reduces RSV progeny production.
Published 2024“…Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired Student’s <i>t</i> test, with results shown as means ± SD. Significance levels are indicated as **<i>p</i> < 0.01, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001.…”