Showing 1,421 - 1,440 results of 18,177 for search 'significant ((((teer decrease) OR (((greater decrease) OR (we decrease))))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1421

    Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

    Published 2024
    “…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
  2. 1422
  3. 1423
  4. 1424
  5. 1425
  6. 1426
  7. 1427
  8. 1428
  9. 1429
  10. 1430
  11. 1431
  12. 1432
  13. 1433
  14. 1434
  15. 1435

    Top 10 significant functional annotations of up-regulated DEGs. by Meitner Cadena (22216261)

    Published 2025
    “…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance according to the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
  16. 1436

    Top 10 significant functional annotations of down-regulated DEGs. by Meitner Cadena (22216261)

    Published 2025
    “…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance level based on the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”
  17. 1437
  18. 1438
  19. 1439
  20. 1440

    Characteristics of studied included. by Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi (7139387)

    Published 2025
    “…The results of meta-regression analyses revealed a statistically significant trend showing a gradual decrease in the prevalence of the composite outcome of anxiety and/or depression over time (RD = -0.004,P = 0.022). …”