بدائل البحث:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
level decrease » levels decreased (توسيع البحث), level increased (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
level decrease » levels decreased (توسيع البحث), level increased (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
8501
Table 3_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
منشور في 2024"…Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis. …"
-
8502
Table 8_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
منشور في 2024"…Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis. …"
-
8503
Table 6_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
منشور في 2024"…Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis. …"
-
8504
Table 5_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
منشور في 2024"…Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis. …"
-
8505
Table 4_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
منشور في 2024"…Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis. …"
-
8506
Table 7_Exploring Histoplasma species seroprevalence and risk factors for seropositivity in The Gambia’s working equid population: Baseline analysis of the Tackling Histoplasmosis...
منشور في 2024"…Seropositivity risk factors were explored by multi-level, multivariable logistic regression analysis. …"
-
8507
CDCP1 regulates CDA and hENT1 expression through c-Src/PKCδ signaling pathway.
منشور في 2025"…<p>(A, B) Quantitative PCR analysis of CDA and hENT1 mRNA expression levels in T24, T24-CD, and T24-CDKO cells. T24-CD cells exhibited increased CDA and decreased hENT1 expression, whereas T24-CDKO cells showed the opposite trend. …"
-
8508
Table 1_Research on the impact of graphene oxide in feed on growth and health parameters in calves.xlsx
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, GPx activity was significantly decreased in the GO group (p = 0.011). …"
-
8509
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8510
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8511
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8512
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8513
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8514
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8515
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8516
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8517
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8518
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8519
Model-derived results show increased social following in individuals with disrupted utility-based risky decision-making.
منشور في 2024"…Across all groups, individuals with worse utility-model fit (larger −LL) in Solo trials showed greater ω<sub>follow</sub> (Pearson’s r = 0.52, <i>P</i> = 2.7e−04, robust correlation).…"
-
8520
Effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on motor function in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
منشور في 2025"…In addition, spasticity significantly decreases, particularly with focused ESWT or ESWT targeting the upper limbs.…"