Search alternatives:
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
201
-
202
Exclusion and enrollment summary from NHANES.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>In individuals aged 30 and above, inflammatory markers PLR, SII, PMR, and NMR decrease in HCV cases. Variability across races, genders, and BMI groups highlights their diagnostic utility in diverse populations.…”
-
203
DSP: Digital Spatial Profiling.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Many patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery (GAS) opt for reconstructive procedures rather than total mastectomy to achieve a more masculine chest contour. …”
-
204
-
205
Demographic information.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Disorders of decreased sound tolerance such as misophonia and hyperacusis cause significant distress through strong negative emotional and physiological reactions to everyday sounds. …”
-
206
-
207
-
208
-
209
-
210
-
211
-
212
Experimental groups.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The study showed that the number of white blood cells, platelets count, granulocyte count and lymphocyte count in both genders of albino rats after 30-, 60- and 90-days exposure to dimethoate was significantly increased where simultaneously the number of red blood cells, hemoglobin level, mean corpuscle hemoglobin count, and mean corpuscle hemoglobin concentration count was decreased considerably due to exposure of dimethoate pesticide in both genders of albino rats. …”
-
213
-
214
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…Also, subgroups analysis of age, gender, and AMI types was performed. The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).…”
-
215
Characteristics of AMI patients with DM.
Published 2024“…Also, subgroups analysis of age, gender, and AMI types was performed. The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).…”
-
216
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
217
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
218
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
219
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
220
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”