Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1081
-
1082
-
1083
-
1084
Growth assessment parameters before and after biological treatment in the different studies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1085
Receiver operating characteristic curve for anti-NIE antibodies for <i>S. stercoralis.</i>
Published 2025“…The seroprevalence did not significantly decrease following DA treatment. These results include all individuals sampled, irrespective of whether they took the medications. …”
-
1086
Effect of ex vivo treatment with rhTGFβ1 or a TGFβ1 inhibitor on monocyte responses to rgE stimulation. Monocytes and NK cells purified from PBMC collected from 10 RZV recipients (demographics in S4 Table) before vaccination (D0) and 90 days post-vaccination (D90) were combined ex vivo and stimulated with VZV-rgE. A subset of D0 monocyte & NK cocultures was also treated with the TGFβ1 inhibitor LY (D0 LY), and a subset of D90 cocultures were supplemented with rhTGFβ1. The graph shows individual data points, means and p values calculated by Friedman test for repeated measures with FDR correction. LY treatment of cells collected on D0 significantly increased their activation to levels similar to D90. Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.
Published 2025“…Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.…”
-
1087
-
1088
-
1089
-
1090
-
1091
Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1092
-
1093
-
1094
-
1095
Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1096
-
1097
-
1098
-
1099
Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1100
Comparison of hardness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: