Showing 11,181 - 11,200 results of 18,516 for search 'significantly ((((((larger decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (linear decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 11181

    Power supply for each power supply unit. by Jingjing Ma (419752)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, it results in a 7.8% reduction in overall costs and a 30.2% decrease in carbon emissions. …”
  2. 11182

    Overall view of the slurry. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  3. 11183

    Definitions of variables. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  4. 11184

    Realistic structure diagram of testing equipment. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  5. 11185

    Engineering geological cross section diagram. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  6. 11186

    The equipped sensors on steel pipes. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  7. 11187

    Close-up view of the slurry. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  8. 11188

    The physical index properties of the loess. by Jiawei Fan (8822046)

    Published 2024
    “…The field experimental results illustrated that: (1) The bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipe with anchorage length of 9 m increases 22.6% compared with that of ordinary grouting pipe. (2) Anchorage length is not a significant influence factor for bearing capacity of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope, while anchorage length is a significant influence factor for modulus of load-displacement curves of inclined steel grouting pipes in loess embankment slope. (3) Effective anchorage length of inclined steel grouting pipe in loess embankment slope will be slightly increased when increasing anchorage length, while the ratio of effective anchorage length to total anchorage length will be decreased when increasing anchorage length. (4) Inclined steel grouting pipe average cohesive strength along effective anchorage length section at the interface between cement grouting and soil stratum is at least three times compared with that of rock bolt.…”
  9. 11189

    Force analysis of soil differential element. by Guihai Gao (21594002)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on Duncan-Chang stress-strain model, this paper puts forward a relationship between friction angle and wall displacement ratio, which can consider both non-limit active state and non-limit passive state. …”
  10. 11190

    Relationship curves of by Guihai Gao (21594002)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on Duncan-Chang stress-strain model, this paper puts forward a relationship between friction angle and wall displacement ratio, which can consider both non-limit active state and non-limit passive state. …”
  11. 11191

    The values used to build graphs. by Guihai Gao (21594002)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on Duncan-Chang stress-strain model, this paper puts forward a relationship between friction angle and wall displacement ratio, which can consider both non-limit active state and non-limit passive state. …”
  12. 11192

    Mohr stress circle under different stress states. by Guihai Gao (21594002)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on Duncan-Chang stress-strain model, this paper puts forward a relationship between friction angle and wall displacement ratio, which can consider both non-limit active state and non-limit passive state. …”
  13. 11193

    The <i>φ</i><sub>m</sub> calculation formulas under three theories. by Guihai Gao (21594002)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on Duncan-Chang stress-strain model, this paper puts forward a relationship between friction angle and wall displacement ratio, which can consider both non-limit active state and non-limit passive state. …”
  14. 11194

    General experimental design. by Marion Hitier (21261938)

    Published 2025
    “…The electromyographic activity of the semitendinosus muscle was affected by the time (p = 0.004). It revealed a decrease after stretching as compared to a post-warm-up measurement. …”
  15. 11195

    Results of the two-way repeated measures ANOVA. by Marion Hitier (21261938)

    Published 2025
    “…The electromyographic activity of the semitendinosus muscle was affected by the time (p = 0.004). It revealed a decrease after stretching as compared to a post-warm-up measurement. …”
  16. 11196
  17. 11197

    Functional iKIR do not consistently modify detrimental genotypes. by Laura Mora-Bitria (20477525)

    Published 2024
    “…<p><b>A</b> In the whole cohort, for most detrimental genotypes, iKIR have no impact on the detrimental effect (the ln[OR] of the detrimental genotype is very similar in the strata with a high iKIR score (blue) and the strata with a low iKIR score (orange) and the 95% confidence intervals are overlapping). …”
  18. 11198
  19. 11199
  20. 11200

    Comparison of dot gain across paper types and screen frequency. by Xiaoli Liu (165371)

    Published 2025
    “…Dot gain curves for 133 lpi and 175 lpi show a consistent non-linear trend, rising to a maximum in the mid-tone range (40%–60% dot area) before decreasing. …”