يعرض 3,341 - 3,360 نتائج من 4,639 نتيجة بحث عن 'significantly ((((((larger decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (linear decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.58s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 3341

    Table 2_Relationship between plasma atherogenic index and subclinical hypothyroidism: an analysis of NHANES data and animal experiment.docx حسب Qiwei Chen (1417807)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Weighted regression and linear models assessed associations between AIP (and its quartiles) and SCH and thyroid hormones. …"
  2. 3342

    Data Sheet 1_Qifuyin alleviates anxiety and depression in 3×Tg-AD mice by modulating neuroendocrine function.zip حسب Tianhao Yu (8120651)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In the QFY-treated group, plasma CORT levels were significantly decreased, whereas FSH and LH levels were significantly increased. …"
  3. 3343

    Data Sheet 1_Metabolic adaptation fluctuates with different prediction equations: a secondary analysis based on a weight-loss clinical trial.docx حسب Molian Tang (18876955)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Both Katch-McArdle-determined RMR and BIA-determined RMR presented a significant decrease between baseline and the end of the intervention (week 16). …"
  4. 3344

    Data Sheet 1_TREM-1 as a potential gatekeeper of neuroinflammatory responses: therapeutic validation and mechanistic insights in experimental traumatic brain injury.zip حسب Yunsheng Zhang (474242)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± SD, and group comparisons were made by two-tailed Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.…"
  5. 3345

    Tropical volcanic eruptions enhance global tropical cyclone geneses حسب Jiuwei Zhao (8548263)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Here, we utilize global </b><b>reanalysis data and high-resolution large ensemble simulations to uncover a robust link </b><b>between TVEs and enhanced global TCGF. We find a significant increase in TCGF over the </b><b>Pacific within two years following strong TVEs, accompanied by an insignificant decrease </b><b>over the South Indian Ocean, leading to a net global TCGF increase. …"
  6. 3346

    Table 1_Association of spicy food consumption with colorectal polyp and adenoma prevalence: findings from the Lanxi Pre-Colorectal Cancer Cohort (LP3C).docx حسب Peiling Hu (12259394)

    منشور في 2025
    "…Restricted cubic spline modeling revealed a non-linear relationship between spicy food intake and polyp risk (P for non-linearity < 0.001), characterized by initial risk elevation followed by a slight decrease with increasing consumption levels. …"
  7. 3347

    Table 1_Refrigerator ownership and the nutrition-health trade-off: evidence from Chinese households.docx حسب Manli Zheng (21288128)

    منشور في 2025
    "…</p>Results<p>Refrigerator ownership significantly increases daily calorie intake by 39.1%. …"
  8. 3348

    Impact of Oral Semaglutide on Kidney Outcomes in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the SOUL Randomized Trial حسب Johannes F. E. Mann (22017555)

    منشور في 2025
    "…</p><p dir="ltr">RESULTS</p><p dir="ltr">Among 9,650 participants, mean eGFR was 73.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 and follow-up was 47.5 months. …"
  9. 3349

    feature parameters حسب CHIN-CHENG CHU (20718575)

    منشور في 2025
    "…<p dir="ltr">We evaluated seven eye‐movement features before and after fatigue using paired t‐tests on mean ± SD values. Sample Entropy on the X-axis decreased from 0.095 ± 0.054 to 0.080 ± 0.048 (p = 0.025) and on the Y-axis from 0.106 ± 0.046 to 0.090 ± 0.043 (p = 0.025), whereas Approximate Entropy and Cross Entropy showed no significant change. …"
  10. 3350

    Data_.xlsx حسب Raja Bouguezzi (17915965)

    منشور في 2024
    "…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …"
  11. 3351

    eIF3d1 phosphorylation but not cap-binding is required for CySC self-renewal. حسب Ruoxu Wang (9312306)

    منشور في 2025
    "…(<b>B</b>) Number of Zfh1<sup>+</sup> Eya<sup>−</sup> CySCs in testes in which wild-type (eIF3d1<sup>WT</sup>), phospho-mimetic (eIF3d1<sup>DD</sup>) or phospho-dead (eIF3d1<sup>NN</sup>) eIF3d1 was over-expressed. Phospho-dead eIF3d1 expression results in a significant decrease in CySC numbers (<i>N</i> ≥ 18 testes, * <i>P</i> < 0.05, ns <i>P</i> = 0.1150 (eIF3d1<sup>WT</sup>) or <i>P</i> > 0.9999 (eIF3d1<sup>DD</sup>), Kruskal-Wallis test). …"
  12. 3352

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  13. 3353

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  14. 3354

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  15. 3355

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  16. 3356

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  17. 3357

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  18. 3358

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  19. 3359

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
  20. 3360

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff حسب Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"