Showing 1,221 - 1,240 results of 1,826 for search 'significantly ((((((larger decrease) OR (teer decrease))) OR (nn decrease))) OR (linear decrease))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 1221

    S5 Fig - The human medial temporal lobe represents memory items in their ordinal position in both declarative and motor memory domains by Ainsley Temudo (21673160)

    Published 2025
    “…Planned pairwise comparisons indicate that in M1 and PMC, similarity values of the diagonal (i.e., lag 0, same position) were significantly larger than all other lags (i.e., lag 0 > all other lags, all <i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05), while in the PHC, the diagonal was only significantly larger than lag 2 (<i>p</i><sub><i>corr</i></sub> < .05). …”
  2. 1222

    Table 1_Refrigerator ownership and the nutrition-health trade-off: evidence from Chinese households.docx by Manli Zheng (21288128)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>Refrigerator ownership significantly increases daily calorie intake by 39.1%. …”
  3. 1223

    Data_.xlsx by Raja Bouguezzi (17915965)

    Published 2024
    “…Additionally, the asymmetry score exhibited a moderate decrease (∆46.96%, ES=0.64). In contrast, no significant changes were observed in the CG across all fitness measures. …”
  4. 1224

    eIF3d1 phosphorylation but not cap-binding is required for CySC self-renewal. by Ruoxu Wang (9312306)

    Published 2025
    “…(<b>B</b>) Number of Zfh1<sup>+</sup> Eya<sup>−</sup> CySCs in testes in which wild-type (eIF3d1<sup>WT</sup>), phospho-mimetic (eIF3d1<sup>DD</sup>) or phospho-dead (eIF3d1<sup>NN</sup>) eIF3d1 was over-expressed. Phospho-dead eIF3d1 expression results in a significant decrease in CySC numbers (<i>N</i> ≥ 18 testes, * <i>P</i> < 0.05, ns <i>P</i> = 0.1150 (eIF3d1<sup>WT</sup>) or <i>P</i> > 0.9999 (eIF3d1<sup>DD</sup>), Kruskal-Wallis test). …”
  5. 1225

    Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  6. 1226

    Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  7. 1227

    Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  8. 1228

    Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  9. 1229

    Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  10. 1230

    Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  11. 1231

    Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  12. 1232

    Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  13. 1233

    Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  14. 1234

    Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff by Haixiao Chen (12565087)

    Published 2025
    “…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
  15. 1235

    Data Sheet 1_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  16. 1236

    Table 3_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  17. 1237

    Table 4_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  18. 1238

    Data Sheet 1_Association between the systemic immune-inflammatory index and the immune response after hepatitis B vaccination: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data.docx by Jiayan Hu (18593615)

    Published 2025
    “…Notably, antibody expression significantly decreased as the SII increased beyond the threshold of 448.3.…”
  19. 1239

    Data Sheet 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”
  20. 1240

    Table 2_Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).docx by Sarah Mendorf (11632098)

    Published 2025
    “…The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.…”