Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
2201
-
2202
-
2203
Summary of previous work.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2204
Comparison of MAP@0.5 results from experiments.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2205
YOLO11.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2206
Structure of the SCI-YOLO11 network.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2207
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2208
Algorithm operation steps.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2209
SCI-YOLO11.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2210
Dataset for insulator defect detection.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2211
YOLOV8.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2212
Faster-RCNN.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2213
Results of ablation experiments.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2214
Structure diagram of SPDConv.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2215
Wise-IOU regression diagram.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2216
Visualization of detection results.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2217
Structure diagram of the SE attention mechanism.
Published 2025“…However, small object detection faces numerous challenges, such as significant difficulty, substantial interference from complex backgrounds, and inconsistent annotation quality. …”
-
2218
Map showing the intervention and control LGAs.
Published 2025“…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
-
2219
Consort diagram.
Published 2025“…However, post-intervention, the adjusted mean SARI Stigma Score significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group, with an adjusted mean difference of 37.72 (95% CI: 36.01–39.43, p < 0.000).…”
-
2220