Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1961
-
1962
-
1963
-
1964
Histogram of the area factorψ.
Published 2025“…The measured <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> decreases following a power-law trend as <i>β</i> and <i>D</i> increase, with weathering reducing the sensitivity of <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> to <i>β</i> but not significantly altering its sensitivity to <i>D</i>. …”
-
1965
Raw dataset Fig. 6.
Published 2025“…The measured <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> decreases following a power-law trend as <i>β</i> and <i>D</i> increase, with weathering reducing the sensitivity of <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> to <i>β</i> but not significantly altering its sensitivity to <i>D</i>. …”
-
1966
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…The expression of sRAGE increased in the early stage of smoke exposure and played a transient pro-inflammatory role. With long-term exposure to cigarette smoke, the inflammatory response is gradually aggravated in lung, and the expression of sRAGE is significantly decreased, and its reduction degree is closely related to the degree of reduced lung function and inflammation.…”
-
1967
-
1968
Schematic for measuring <i>D</i> and <i>D</i>′ values.
Published 2025“…The measured <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> decreases following a power-law trend as <i>β</i> and <i>D</i> increase, with weathering reducing the sensitivity of <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> to <i>β</i> but not significantly altering its sensitivity to <i>D</i>. …”
-
1969
-
1970
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR.
Published 2025“…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
-
1971
siRNA sequences and negative controls sequences.
Published 2025“…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
-
1972
Antibodies used in the study.
Published 2025“…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
-
1973
Datasets used in the study.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The findings indicate a significant increase in the availability of health facilities offering modern family planning services in Bangladesh; however, a slight decline has been observed in their overall mean readiness score. …”
-
1974
-
1975
Experiment setting.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
-
1976
Experimental flow.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
-
1977
Example of Group C scene material.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
-
1978
SAGAT Assessment Sample Questions.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
-
1979
3x3 Latin square design.
Published 2025“…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
-
1980