Showing 1,941 - 1,960 results of 18,095 for search 'significantly ((((((largest decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (greatest decrease))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.64s Refine Results
  1. 1941

    Amplitude for A/L = 0.03. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

    Published 2025
    “…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
  2. 1942

    Genes show significant expression change in meta-analysis and their connection with Sjogren’s syndrome and thyroid cancer. by Fanyong Kong (20700261)

    Published 2025
    “…A gene in red indicates significantly increased expression in the meta-analysis, whereas a gene in blue indicates significantly decreased expression in the meta-analysis.…”
  3. 1943
  4. 1944

    Dynamics of Solid–Liquid Compound Droplets on Cylindrically Concave Superhydrophobic Surfaces by Niju K. Mohammed (22631779)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, higher surface concavity ratios suppress spreading and reduce residence time for a given We. For instance, the compound droplet on a concave surface exhibited a 30% reduction in contact time compared to its flat counterpart. …”
  5. 1945

    Dynamics of Solid–Liquid Compound Droplets on Cylindrically Concave Superhydrophobic Surfaces by Niju K. Mohammed (22631779)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, higher surface concavity ratios suppress spreading and reduce residence time for a given We. For instance, the compound droplet on a concave surface exhibited a 30% reduction in contact time compared to its flat counterpart. …”
  6. 1946

    Dynamics of Solid–Liquid Compound Droplets on Cylindrically Concave Superhydrophobic Surfaces by Niju K. Mohammed (22631779)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, higher surface concavity ratios suppress spreading and reduce residence time for a given We. For instance, the compound droplet on a concave surface exhibited a 30% reduction in contact time compared to its flat counterpart. …”
  7. 1947

    Dynamics of Solid–Liquid Compound Droplets on Cylindrically Concave Superhydrophobic Surfaces by Niju K. Mohammed (22631779)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, higher surface concavity ratios suppress spreading and reduce residence time for a given We. For instance, the compound droplet on a concave surface exhibited a 30% reduction in contact time compared to its flat counterpart. …”
  8. 1948

    Dynamics of Solid–Liquid Compound Droplets on Cylindrically Concave Superhydrophobic Surfaces by Niju K. Mohammed (22631779)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, higher surface concavity ratios suppress spreading and reduce residence time for a given We. For instance, the compound droplet on a concave surface exhibited a 30% reduction in contact time compared to its flat counterpart. …”
  9. 1949
  10. 1950

    Supplementary Material for: Significant Dry Weight Reduction After Transition from Peritoneal Dialysis to Hemodialysis by Lin Y.-T. (17065287)

    Published 2025
    “…After transitioning to HD, body weight decreased significantly, with a reduction of -2.8 kg at one month, -5.3 kg at three months, and -7.5 kg one year post-transition. …”
  11. 1951
  12. 1952

    Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
  13. 1953
  14. 1954
  15. 1955

    Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
  16. 1956
  17. 1957
  18. 1958
  19. 1959
  20. 1960