Showing 1,961 - 1,980 results of 18,038 for search 'significantly ((((((largest decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (teer decrease))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.78s Refine Results
  1. 1961
  2. 1962
  3. 1963
  4. 1964

    Histogram of the area factorψ. by Hong Zhang (25820)

    Published 2025
    “…The measured <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> decreases following a power-law trend as <i>β</i> and <i>D</i> increase, with weathering reducing the sensitivity of <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> to <i>β</i> but not significantly altering its sensitivity to <i>D</i>. …”
  5. 1965

    Raw dataset Fig. 6. by Hong Zhang (25820)

    Published 2025
    “…The measured <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> decreases following a power-law trend as <i>β</i> and <i>D</i> increase, with weathering reducing the sensitivity of <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> to <i>β</i> but not significantly altering its sensitivity to <i>D</i>. …”
  6. 1966

    S1 Dataset - by Yue He (385239)

    Published 2024
    “…The expression of sRAGE increased in the early stage of smoke exposure and played a transient pro-inflammatory role. With long-term exposure to cigarette smoke, the inflammatory response is gradually aggravated in lung, and the expression of sRAGE is significantly decreased, and its reduction degree is closely related to the degree of reduced lung function and inflammation.…”
  7. 1967
  8. 1968

    Schematic for measuring <i>D</i> and <i>D</i>′ values. by Hong Zhang (25820)

    Published 2025
    “…The measured <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> decreases following a power-law trend as <i>β</i> and <i>D</i> increase, with weathering reducing the sensitivity of <i>I</i><sub>s</sub> to <i>β</i> but not significantly altering its sensitivity to <i>D</i>. …”
  9. 1969
  10. 1970

    Primer sequences for RT-qPCR. by Wenlong Shen (9313937)

    Published 2025
    “…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
  11. 1971

    siRNA sequences and negative controls sequences. by Wenlong Shen (9313937)

    Published 2025
    “…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
  12. 1972

    Antibodies used in the study. by Wenlong Shen (9313937)

    Published 2025
    “…Data from TCGA showed that NCOA4 shows greater downgrade in tumor tissues than in non-tumor tissues and the overall survival (OS) of patients with low NCOA4 expression was significantly shorter than that of patients with high NCOA4 expression.The qPCR results showed that NCOA4 was expressed at low levels in cholangiocarcinoma tissue specimens; the mRNA expression of NCOA4 decreased after knocking down NCOA4 in cells. …”
  13. 1973

    Datasets used in the study. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The findings indicate a significant increase in the availability of health facilities offering modern family planning services in Bangladesh; however, a slight decline has been observed in their overall mean readiness score. …”
  14. 1974
  15. 1975

    Experiment setting. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  16. 1976

    Experimental flow. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  17. 1977

    Example of Group C scene material. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  18. 1978

    SAGAT Assessment Sample Questions. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  19. 1979

    3x3 Latin square design. by Chengmin Zhou (14554562)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the advantages of the AR display will weaken as the complexity of the scenarios decreases. Additionally, the Surround Recognition (SR) display is more likely to reduce drivers’ SA (the fixation counts on the SR display was significantly higher than that on the P3D and AR displays; P < 0.001) and take-over efficiency (the take-over reaction time for the SR display was significantly longer than that for the AR display; P = 0.09), especially in medium-complexity scenarios. …”
  20. 1980