Showing 1,921 - 1,940 results of 18,193 for search 'significantly ((((((less decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (greater decrease))) OR (nn decrease))', query time: 0.87s Refine Results
  1. 1921
  2. 1922
  3. 1923

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  4. 1924

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  5. 1925

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  6. 1926

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  7. 1927

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  8. 1928

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  9. 1929

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  10. 1930

    Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  11. 1931

    Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  12. 1932

    Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  13. 1933

    Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  14. 1934

    Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  15. 1935

    Table 6_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  16. 1936

    Table 5_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  17. 1937

    Table 7_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  18. 1938

    Table 9_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  19. 1939
  20. 1940