Showing 2,081 - 2,100 results of 18,267 for search 'significantly ((((((less decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (greater decrease))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.79s Refine Results
  1. 2081
  2. 2082
  3. 2083
  4. 2084
  5. 2085
  6. 2086
  7. 2087
  8. 2088

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  9. 2089

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  10. 2090

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  11. 2091

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  12. 2092

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  13. 2093

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  14. 2094

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  15. 2095

    Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …”
  16. 2096

    Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  17. 2097

    Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  18. 2098

    Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  19. 2099

    Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
  20. 2100

    Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx by Stefanie Wagner (743707)

    Published 2025
    “…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”