Showing 6,401 - 6,420 results of 18,150 for search 'significantly ((((((less decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (greatest decrease))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 6401

    Experimental design of this study. by Renya Kawakami (20469088)

    Published 2024
    “…However, only a few studies that investigated influences of male aging as well as male mating experience on their post-copulatory sexual selection. …”
  2. 6402

    All relevant data of this study. by Renya Kawakami (20469088)

    Published 2024
    “…However, only a few studies that investigated influences of male aging as well as male mating experience on their post-copulatory sexual selection. …”
  3. 6403

    Supplementary Material for: Off-label Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Feng L. (5056958)

    Published 2024
    “…Introduction: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used off-label in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), although the literature does not consistently agree on its efficacy and safety. …”
  4. 6404

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  5. 6405

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  6. 6406

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  7. 6407

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  8. 6408

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  9. 6409

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  10. 6410

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  11. 6411

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  12. 6412

    Table 1_Inhibitory control in the sober state as a function of alcohol sensitivity: a pilot functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.docx by Roberto U. Cofresí (20800094)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on these preliminary findings, future studies with larger samples are warranted to determine the extent to which domain-general IC performance associated with fronto-cortico-striatal IC circuit activation contributes to the alcohol use pathophysiology, and whether therapeutic interventions (e.g., non-invasive brain stimulation) targeting fronto-cortico-striatal IC circuitry may decrease AUD symptomatology.…”
  13. 6413

    Table 2_Inhibitory control in the sober state as a function of alcohol sensitivity: a pilot functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.docx by Roberto U. Cofresí (20800094)

    Published 2025
    “…Based on these preliminary findings, future studies with larger samples are warranted to determine the extent to which domain-general IC performance associated with fronto-cortico-striatal IC circuit activation contributes to the alcohol use pathophysiology, and whether therapeutic interventions (e.g., non-invasive brain stimulation) targeting fronto-cortico-striatal IC circuitry may decrease AUD symptomatology.…”
  14. 6414

    Baseline characteristics. by Seung Min Lee (1644409)

    Published 2025
    “…Such a change was relevant to the improvement in BCVA, but not metamorphopsia.…”
  15. 6415

    Data file used in this study. by Seung Min Lee (1644409)

    Published 2025
    “…Such a change was relevant to the improvement in BCVA, but not metamorphopsia.…”
  16. 6416

    Changes in foveal location after surgery. by Seung Min Lee (1644409)

    Published 2025
    “…Such a change was relevant to the improvement in BCVA, but not metamorphopsia.…”
  17. 6417

    Flowchart of Methodology. by Kamal Hossain (331680)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Dengue cases in Bangladesh exhibited a significant increase from 2019 to 2023 (excluding 2020 data), with a cumulative total of 513,344 reported cases. …”
  18. 6418

    A reas of actual and simulated LULC in 2023. by Firdissa Sadeta Tiye (21222102)

    Published 2025
    “…The analysis revealed significant LULC changes in BMNP, from 1993 to 2023, primarily due to anthropogenic activities, with further changes anticipated between 2023 and 2053.The results showed a notable increase in woodland and shrubs at the expense of grassland and Erica forest. …”
  19. 6419
  20. 6420