The outcomes of transcriptome analyses. by Lihan Xu (18778257)

Fig 10 - by Zhezhe Zhang (19704587)

Fig 19 - by Zhezhe Zhang (19704587)

Fig 8 - by Zhezhe Zhang (19704587)

Fig 20 - by Zhezhe Zhang (19704587)

The impact of UV360 on the viability and developmental progression of zebrafish embryos. by Lihan Xu (18778257)

The impact of UV360 on the neurophysiological activity of zebrafish larvae. by Lihan Xu (18778257)

Fig 26 - by Zhezhe Zhang (19704587)

Fig 5 - by Zhezhe Zhang (19704587)

(A) PCA score scatter plots; (B)Heat map visualization of detected metabolites in PD and D phases; Various colors in the figure represent the relative content. by Bingshuo Shi (21485387)

The global changes of prevalence (A-C), DALYs (D-F), and mortality (G-I) rates of IBD among WCBA from 1990 to 2021. by Jiefeng Zhao (9090305)

Data. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”

Baseline and Post-Treatment Myocardial Perfusion Defects Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Left Ventricular Surface Area in Each Experimental Group. by Káryta Suely Macêdo Martins (22404155)

(A) Number of crossings, (B) Number of rearings, (C) Latency time for novel object, (D) Familiar object exploration time, (E) Novel object exploration time for novel object recogni... by Hammad Ismail (4227988)

GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Funnel plot of VO_2Peak inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”