Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
2141
-
2142
-
2143
-
2144
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the IL-1β expression.
Published 2025“…In the co-treatment groups, a significant dose-dependent decrease was seen in the IL-1β expression <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
2145
-
2146
-
2147
-
2148
-
2149
-
2150
-
2151
-
2152
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the NF-κB gene expression.
Published 2025“…Two lower concentrations of Vit D induced a reduction in the NF-κB expression compared to the control, while the highest concentration increased it significantly <b>(B)</b>. In the co-treatment groups, a dose-dependent decrease pattern among different concentration was seen in the NF-κB expression, but generally it was increased compared to the control <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
2153
RICTOR regulates UGCG expression via transcription factor Zinc Finger X-linked (ZFX).
Published 2025“…<b>(T)</b> Tumor growth kinetics recorded a significantly higher growth of MCF-7_ZFX<sup>OE</sup> (mean ± SEM, <i>n</i> = 4-6) than MCF-7_VECT<sup>OE</sup> tumors. …”
-
2154
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2155
Classification of hand grip strength.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2156
Rating scale for functional severity [28].
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2157
Regression model coefficients.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2158
ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2159
WHO BMI classification for adults.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2160
Related to Fig 1.
Published 2025“…(<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>) Absolute quantification (mean ± SEM, <i>n</i> = 3–4) of GM3 (E), GD3 (F), GM2 (G), and GM1 (H) gangliosides shows an increase in GD3 and GM2 gangliosides and a decrease in GM3 and GM1 gangliosides in BT-474_UGCG<sup>OE</sup> cells compared to BT-474 cells. …”