Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
1121
-
1122
-
1123
-
1124
-
1125
-
1126
-
1127
Comparison of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in Millimeters as a Function of Kernel Size.
Published 2025“…<p>Fig 8 presents the mean absolute error (MAE) in millimeters as a function of kernel size (in pixels) for two model configurations. …”
-
1128
Behaviour and significance of reservoir evaporation and seepage losses – an experience of four reservoirs in Damodar River Valley, India
Published 2025“…Annual seepage loss and its mean rate increased gradually for a considerable period during initial operation stage; later, both decreased and stabilized. …”
-
1129
Effect of busulfan treatment on androgens and androgen receptors.
Published 2025“…The androgen concentration remains stable after busulfan treatment, but the androgen receptor concentration significantly decreases 21 days after treatment. Values are presented as means ± standard deviations; n = 3 per group. * <i>p</i> < 0.05, ** <i>p</i> < 0.01.…”
-
1130
Probing the Histamine H<sub>1</sub> Receptor Binding Site to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics
Published 2024“…Therefore, the levocetirizine mimics are less sensitive to structural changes. This study illustrates that for H<sub>1</sub>R, there are several ways to increase RT but the different strategies differ significantly in SKR.…”
-
1131
Probing the Histamine H<sub>1</sub> Receptor Binding Site to Explore Ligand Binding Kinetics
Published 2024“…Therefore, the levocetirizine mimics are less sensitive to structural changes. This study illustrates that for H<sub>1</sub>R, there are several ways to increase RT but the different strategies differ significantly in SKR.…”
-
1132
Key safety measures including adverse events.
Published 2025“…Waist circumference (mean change (MC) −2.23 cm; 95% CI [−3.98, −0.49]; <i>p</i> = 0.01), BMI (MC −0.49 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI [−0.88, −0.10[; <i>p</i> = 0.01), and android fat mass measured by DXA (MC −167 g; 95% CI [−264, −71[; <i>p</i> < 0.001) decreased in the COCP group over the study period whilst there was no statistically significant changes in these parameters in the metformin only group when compared to baseline.. …”
-
1133
-
1134
-
1135
-
1136
-
1137
-
1138
-
1139
-
1140