Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
5801
-
5802
-
5803
-
5804
-
5805
-
5806
-
5807
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
5808
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
5809
UCS texts data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
5810
-
5811
-
5812
-
5813
-
5814
Supporting information_raw dataset.
Published 2025“…While HR enhanced most soil P fractions, higher N rates (>N100) tended to decrease labile-Pi (inorganic) fractions by up to 45% suggesting a potential decline in plant-available P. …”
-
5815
Soil phosphorus fractionations procedure [41].
Published 2025“…While HR enhanced most soil P fractions, higher N rates (>N100) tended to decrease labile-Pi (inorganic) fractions by up to 45% suggesting a potential decline in plant-available P. …”
-
5816
Top view of the experimental setup.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
-
5817
Parameters of energy harvesting.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
-
5818
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
-
5819
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”
-
5820
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…By increasing the surface roughness of the bluff body, the lock-in region decreases and as a result, the harvested power from that bluff body is reduced. …”