Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7381
Image 1_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7382
Differences in magnitude and velocity of decay of the different compartments of the viral reservoir.
Published 2025“…<p>A. The overall decrease in each fraction of the viral reservoir during the first year after ART initiation is expressed as the ratio of week 48 to baseline values. …”
-
7383
-
7384
-
7385
-
7386
GWAS analysis using Cluster 2 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…<p>(A) Genome-wide association results of the impact of identified SNPs on viral copies during SARS-CoV-2 infection. …”
-
7387
GWAS analysis using only Cluster 1 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…<p>(A) Genome-wide association results of the impact of identified SNPs on viral copies during SARS-CoV-2 infection. …”
-
7388
GWAS analysis using Cluster 3 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…<p>(A) Genome-wide association results of the impact of identified SNPs on viral copies during SARS-CoV-2 infection. …”
-
7389
GWAS analysis using Cluster 4 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…<p>(A) Genome-wide association results of the impact of identified SNPs on viral copies during SARS-CoV-2 infection. …”
-
7390
-
7391
-
7392
-
7393
-
7394
-
7395
-
7396
Table 1_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.docx
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7397
Image 4_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7398
Image 2_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7399
Image 3_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7400
Image 5_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”