Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
2061
-
2062
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the IL-1β expression.
Published 2025“…In the co-treatment groups, a significant dose-dependent decrease was seen in the IL-1β expression <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
2063
-
2064
-
2065
-
2066
-
2067
-
2068
-
2069
-
2070
The effect of IFN-β and Vit D on the NF-κB gene expression.
Published 2025“…Two lower concentrations of Vit D induced a reduction in the NF-κB expression compared to the control, while the highest concentration increased it significantly <b>(B)</b>. In the co-treatment groups, a dose-dependent decrease pattern among different concentration was seen in the NF-κB expression, but generally it was increased compared to the control <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
2071
RICTOR regulates UGCG expression via transcription factor Zinc Finger X-linked (ZFX).
Published 2025“…<b>(T)</b> Tumor growth kinetics recorded a significantly higher growth of MCF-7_ZFX<sup>OE</sup> (mean ± SEM, <i>n</i> = 4-6) than MCF-7_VECT<sup>OE</sup> tumors. …”
-
2072
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2073
Classification of hand grip strength.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2074
Rating scale for functional severity [28].
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2075
Regression model coefficients.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2076
ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2077
WHO BMI classification for adults.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
2078
Related to Fig 1.
Published 2025“…(<b>E</b>–<b>H</b>) Absolute quantification (mean ± SEM, <i>n</i> = 3–4) of GM3 (E), GD3 (F), GM2 (G), and GM1 (H) gangliosides shows an increase in GD3 and GM2 gangliosides and a decrease in GM3 and GM1 gangliosides in BT-474_UGCG<sup>OE</sup> cells compared to BT-474 cells. …”
-
2079
-
2080