Showing 201 - 220 results of 18,045 for search 'significantly ((((((less decrease) OR (largest decrease))) OR (teer decrease))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.44s Refine Results
  1. 201

    Analysis of the significantly different metabolomic features. by Bhuripit Saraphol (20855573)

    Published 2025
    “…<b>(B)</b> Volcano plot highlighting the significantly different metabolomic features. The red dots represent the features with significantly increased intensity, and the purple dots represent the features with significantly decreased intensity. …”
  2. 202
  3. 203
  4. 204
  5. 205
  6. 206
  7. 207
  8. 208

    MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models. by Qiaozhen Qin (13159201)

    Published 2025
    “…</b> The KEGG pathway analysis identifies the number of target genes within each pathway. Those with a p-value < 0.05 are considered significant. <b>L.…”
  9. 209

    NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission. by Jinwei Zhang (462455)

    Published 2025
    “…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P <  0.001). …”
  10. 210
  11. 211
  12. 212
  13. 213

    Development of a CRISPR/Cas-Based Detection Platform for Tracking Decreased Susceptibility to Cephalosporins in Neisseria gonorrheae by Ziyuan Zhao (2889005)

    Published 2025
    “…We have developed the Multiplex Integrated RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a detection Assay (MIRCA) for simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrheae (<i>Ng</i>) and mutations with decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins. …”
  14. 214
  15. 215
  16. 216
  17. 217

    HFD decreases intermediate-term memory. by Tong Yue (6033305)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(A) The survival rate of 10d <i>Canton-S</i> fed with ND or HFD was observed for 7 days. …”
  18. 218
  19. 219

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  20. 220