Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1621
-
1622
-
1623
-
1624
-
1625
-
1626
-
1627
-
1628
-
1629
-
1630
-
1631
-
1632
Study selection criteria.
Published 2025“…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…”
-
1633
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
Published 2025“…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…”
-
1634
PRISMA flow chart.
Published 2025“…Durability was observed in a long-term follow-up trial (mean duration, 45.4 months) with a 0.9-point CAPS decrease from post-treatment.…”
-
1635
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1636
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1637
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1638
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1639
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1640
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”