Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1921
-
1922
-
1923
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1924
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1925
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1926
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1927
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1928
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1929
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
1930
Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1931
Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1932
Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1933
Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1934
Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1935
Table 6_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1936
Table 5_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1937
Table 7_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1938
Table 9_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
1939
-
1940