Search alternatives:
less decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
less decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2541
-
2542
-
2543
-
2544
-
2545
-
2546
-
2547
-
2548
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2549
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2550
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2551
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2552
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2553
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2554
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
2555
Table 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2556
Table 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2557
Table 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2558
Table 8_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2559
Table 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2560
Table 6_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.xlsx
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”