Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
less decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2281
-
2282
Image 3_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.tif
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2283
Image 1_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.tif
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2284
Image 2_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.tif
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2285
Image 4_Absolute abundance calculation enhances the significance of microbiome data in antibiotic treatment studies.tif
Published 2025“…In contrast, analysis of relative abundances only showed a decrease of Faecalibacterium and Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and, thus, a much less detailed antibiotic effect.…”
-
2286
-
2287
Data.
Published 2025“…Using a generalized estimating equation model that accounted for age, sex, bednet use, and sentinel site, we found no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two treatment approaches (p = 0.845 for Mf and p = 0.332 for CFA). …”
-
2288
-
2289
-
2290
Recruitment flow diagram of the current study.
Published 2025“…Phase 1 EQ-VAS decreases were associated with female sex, lower somatic symptom, fewer comorbidities, lack of expectation for a fast recovery, higher ISS, higher injury pain, neck, spine/back or lower extremity injuries. …”
-
2291
-
2292
-
2293
-
2294
Comparison of absolute and relative errors.
Published 2025“…A significant reduction in both error types is observed, with the relative error |<i>X</i><sub><i>r</i></sub>| decreasing from approximately 10<sup>−1</sup> to 10<sup>−8</sup>. …”
-
2295
Rate of convergence for relative errors.
Published 2025“…A significant reduction in both error types is observed, with the relative error |<i>X</i><sub><i>r</i></sub>| decreasing from approximately 10<sup>−1</sup> to 10<sup>−8</sup>. …”
-
2296
-
2297
Changes in relative abundance of genera in both therapeutic groups.
Published 2024“…Negative values refer to reduction in abundance after treatment (Mann-Whitney test, a, p = 0.049; b, p = 0.001; c, p = 0.006). For instance, <i>Catonella</i> had a median increase of 35.5% in the probiotic group compared to a median reduction of 52% in the placebo. …”
-
2298
-
2299
-
2300