Image_3_Education and metabolic syndrome: a Mendelian randomization study.pdf by Dong Liu (115204)

“…</p>Results<p>Education demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the risk of MetS (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.48–0.63, p = 2.18E−51), waist circumference(OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76–0.83, p = 4.98E-33), hypertension (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.95–0.97; p = 4.54E-10), Fasting blood glucose (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.97, p = 7.58E-6) and triglycerides (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.79–0.87, p = 7.87E-18) while showing a positive association with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.18–1.25, p = 1.45E-31).…”

Image_4_Education and metabolic syndrome: a Mendelian randomization study.pdf by Dong Liu (115204)

“…</p>Results<p>Education demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the risk of MetS (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.48–0.63, p = 2.18E−51), waist circumference(OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76–0.83, p = 4.98E-33), hypertension (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.95–0.97; p = 4.54E-10), Fasting blood glucose (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.97, p = 7.58E-6) and triglycerides (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.79–0.87, p = 7.87E-18) while showing a positive association with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.18–1.25, p = 1.45E-31).…”

Image_2_Education and metabolic syndrome: a Mendelian randomization study.pdf by Dong Liu (115204)

“…</p>Results<p>Education demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the risk of MetS (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.48–0.63, p = 2.18E−51), waist circumference(OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76–0.83, p = 4.98E-33), hypertension (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.95–0.97; p = 4.54E-10), Fasting blood glucose (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.97, p = 7.58E-6) and triglycerides (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.79–0.87, p = 7.87E-18) while showing a positive association with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.18–1.25, p = 1.45E-31).…”

Image_1_Education and metabolic syndrome: a Mendelian randomization study.pdf by Dong Liu (115204)

“…</p>Results<p>Education demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the risk of MetS (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.48–0.63, p = 2.18E−51), waist circumference(OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.76–0.83, p = 4.98E-33), hypertension (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.95–0.97; p = 4.54E-10), Fasting blood glucose (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.97, p = 7.58E-6) and triglycerides (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.79–0.87, p = 7.87E-18) while showing a positive association with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.18–1.25, p = 1.45E-31).…”

Description of study characteristics. by Feline de la Court (15194678)

“…Loss of PrEP retention rates were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in studies from Europe, Australia and multiple regions (vs. …”

Data Sheet 1_A systematic review of the effects of nanoplastics on fish.pdf by Asok K. Dasmahapatra (2275549)

“…Among these, NAPs have superior sorption capacity, a large surface area, and a greater ability to release co-contaminants into tissues, resulting in more complex and harmful effects compared to MAPs and MIPs. …”

pHI for net status. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

Combined net integrity PBO and LLINs-PLOS1. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

Factors affecting pyrethroid-LLINs integrity. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

Factors associated with mosquito net integrity. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

LLINs knockdown performance over time. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

Factors affecting PBO-LLINs integrity. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

Net bioefficacy data. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

House structure and status. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

LLINs hole positions over time. by Job Oyweri (22041452)

“…Against a Bungoma pyrethroid-resistant <i><i>Anopheles gambiae</i></i> s.s<i>,</i> mosquito mortality with pyrethroid-LLINs declined from 36.9% when new to 6.8% at 18 months, while PBO-LLINs dropped from 55.6% to 11.8%.…”

A, B. Effects on explicit instruction about prospects of alternative goals on behavior. by Sneha Aenugu (21364349)

“…<p><b>A.</b> Task performance improves with instructions yet significantly falls short of the optimal prospective agent. …”

Mean daily sediment transport (g m^-2 day^-1) under different vegetation types and soil cover in southeastern Utah, USA, 2004 to 2018. by Andrew Kulmatiski (833256)

Grid division diagram. by Ming Zhang (9736)

“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”

Model calculation diagram. by Ming Zhang (9736)

“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”

Grid independence verification. by Ming Zhang (9736)

“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”