Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2861
Search strategy.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2862
Fig 1 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2863
GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2864
Fig 4 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2865
Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2866
Fig 3 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2867
Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2868
Cumulative meta-analysis.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2869
Summary of immunogenicity information.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
2870
-
2871
-
2872
Supplementary file 1_Influence of attentional state on EEG-based motor imagery of lower limb.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Conclusion<p>This study reveals that attentional states significantly influence the neural efficiency of lower-limb motor imagery by modulating ERD/AMI and demonstrates that the TBR can serve as a real-time indicator of attention, providing a novel tool for optimizing attentional processes in motor skill training.…”
-
2873
-
2874
-
2875
-
2876
-
2877
-
2878
-
2879
-
2880