Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2021
-
2022
The correlogram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”
-
2023
The food consumption quantity.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”
-
2024
Dataset.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrated that groups with a lower prevalence of diabetes showed lower dietary EFP, while the dietary EFP and GHG emissions peaked among the prediabetes group with a prevalence of 32.7%−34.9%, and then decreased significantly with the increasing prevalence of prediabetes. …”
-
2025
-
2026
-
2027
-
2028
-
2029
-
2030
-
2031
-
2032
-
2033
-
2034
-
2035
-
2036
-
2037
-
2038
-
2039
Baseline characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…Adjusted linear regression indicated DRG implementation was negatively associated with the log mean of costs (β = –0.002, 95% CI: – 0.003, – 0.001), a 0.2% reduction. …”
-
2040
The framework diagram of this study.
Published 2025“…Adjusted linear regression indicated DRG implementation was negatively associated with the log mean of costs (β = –0.002, 95% CI: – 0.003, – 0.001), a 0.2% reduction. …”