Showing 3,841 - 3,860 results of 6,641 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (larger decrease))) OR (mean decrease))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.56s Refine Results
  1. 3841

    Baseline results of the impact of RLM on HWSW. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  2. 3842

    The influencing factors of RLM. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  3. 3843

    Variable definitions and basic statistics. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  4. 3844

    Average and marginal effects of RLM on HWSW. by Yi Yu (28902)

    Published 2025
    “…Specifically, with every 1% increase in RLM, the likelihood of rural residents’ HWSW will decrease by 3.5%. This effect remains significant after a series of robustness checks. …”
  5. 3845

    Deleting liver-innervating cholinergic neurons induces beiging of ingWAT. by Jiyeon Hwang (19747297)

    Published 2024
    “…(C, D) Plots showing the distribution of the average adipocyte size (left panel). Right panel: The mean cell area was significantly smaller in the experimental groups than in controls (control, <i>n</i> = 4 mice; experimental, <i>n</i> = 5 mice, unpaired <i>t</i> test, *<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
  6. 3846
  7. 3847
  8. 3848
  9. 3849

    Activation of the RSC-ACC projections causes mechanical and thermal pain sensitization. by Shun Hao (11848871)

    Published 2025
    “…CNO in hM3Dq group, **<i>p</i> = 0.0021 < 0.01, <i>n =</i> 9 mice). ns means no significant difference. Error bars indicate SEM. …”
  10. 3850
  11. 3851

    Basic information of the participants. by Jincheng Huang (9306806)

    Published 2024
    “…The scores of deformity of Stahl’s ear were lower than those of others after follow-up (P < 0.05). …”
  12. 3852

    Cross-sectional dependence results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  13. 3853

    Autocorrelation test results. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  14. 3854

    Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  15. 3855

    Descriptive statistics of related variables. by Ozlem Kutlu Furtuna (20308206)

    Published 2024
    “…The results of the panel data analysis show a U-shaped relationship between FDI and carbon emissions which means carbon emissions decrease to a certain level with increasing FDI investment and after this level, increasing FDI increases the environmental degradation in terms of carbon emissions. …”
  16. 3856
  17. 3857
  18. 3858
  19. 3859
  20. 3860

    Complementary conditioning measures in healthy subjects. by Gabriela Ribeiro (4748373)

    Published 2024
    “…<b>(I) Novelty</b> ratings significantly decreased from pre to post-conditioning (F<sub>(1,51)</sub> = 10.2, <i>P</i> = 0.002; post hoc CS<sup>-</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.0001; post hoc CS<sup>+</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.01) but similarly for both stimuli (F<sub>(1, 51)</sub> = 0.17, <i>P</i> = 0.7; Interaction: F<sub>(1, 51)</sub> = 1.1, <i>P</i> = 0.3). …”