Ordinal regression predictions. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

The statistical data of the partial graph. by Si Yu Zhao (19544793)

“…Behavioral tests of both mutant and control strains revealed that the <i>rho-l</i>^{<i>△807</i>} mutant mosquitoes had a significant decrease in their ability to search for preferred oviposition sites that correlated with a reduced ability to recognize long-wavelength red light. …”

Experimental Design Flowchart. by Si Yu Zhao (19544793)

“…Behavioral tests of both mutant and control strains revealed that the <i>rho-l</i>^{<i>△807</i>} mutant mosquitoes had a significant decrease in their ability to search for preferred oviposition sites that correlated with a reduced ability to recognize long-wavelength red light. …”

Binary classification predictions. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Compound eye blindfolding and its effect on the search for oviposition sites. by Si Yu Zhao (19544793)

Relationship between ordinal regression and binary classification performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Raw data underlying figures 1–7. by Alejandra Barrera-Rosales (21656278)

“…In M0 and M2 macrophages, the SMPs induced a mixed secretion of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-12p40, and a significant decrease of TGF-β1. …”

Label distributions across mental states and dataset splits. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Binary classification task performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Ordinal regression task performance. by Thierry Jean (20691795)

Distribution of stable isotope values for consumers faceted by coastscape and feeding habit. by Nathan D. McTigue (10706460)

Search strategy. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Fig 1 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Fig 4 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Fig 3 - by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Cumulative meta-analysis. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”

Summary of immunogenicity information. by Alvine M. Akumbom (20460907)

“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”