Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
lower decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
5141
Search strategy.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5142
Fig 1 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5143
GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5144
Fig 4 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5145
Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5146
Fig 3 -
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5147
Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5148
Cumulative meta-analysis.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5149
Summary of immunogenicity information.
Published 2024“…GMT results of HPV16 and HPV18 genotypes were significantly lower in PWH; Hedges’s g -0.434 (95% CI: -0.823, -0.046) and Hedges’s g -0.57 (95% CI: -0.72, -0.43), respectively. …”
-
5150
-
5151
-
5152
-
5153
-
5154
Passive sensing data.
Published 2025“…Results also showed that metrics that do not account for imbalance (mean absolute error, accuracy) systematically overestimated performance, XGBoost models performed on par with or better than LSTM models, and a significant yet very small decrease in performance was observed as the forecast horizon expanded. …”
-
5155
Surveys.
Published 2025“…Results also showed that metrics that do not account for imbalance (mean absolute error, accuracy) systematically overestimated performance, XGBoost models performed on par with or better than LSTM models, and a significant yet very small decrease in performance was observed as the forecast horizon expanded. …”
-
5156
-
5157
-
5158
-
5159
-
5160