Showing 641 - 660 results of 18,470 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (linear decrease))) OR (a decrease))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.64s Refine Results
  1. 641
  2. 642
  3. 643
  4. 644
  5. 645
  6. 646
  7. 647
  8. 648
  9. 649
  10. 650
  11. 651

    Tuning the Upper Critical Solution Temperature of the Polystyrene-Terpineol System toward a Low-Temperature Membrane Formation by Sulaiman Dhameri (22048528)

    Published 2025
    “…The study found that the hydrogen bond propensity and miscibility of the additives significantly affected the UCST. A change of over 35 °C was observed when the additive concentration varied from 0 to 15 wt %, and the transition temperature increased or decreased depending on the additive solvent strength. …”
  12. 652
  13. 653
  14. 654
  15. 655

    A sample choice question with a warning label. by Yulian Ding (5984591)

    Published 2024
    “…The random parameters logit model results showed a significant overall decrease in SSB purchases when a warning label was present, indicated by a significant negative coefficient associated with the label. …”
  16. 656

    HFD decreases ITM and alters metabolic homeostasis. by Tong Yue (6033305)

    Published 2025
    “…Two-way ANOVA, n.s., not significant, ** p < 0.01). <b>(F)</b> Long-term memory (LTM) was significantly decreased in the HFD group. …”
  17. 657

    Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index. by Søren Egstrand (10906087)

    Published 2025
    “…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …”
  18. 658
  19. 659
  20. 660

    Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex. by Kimberly Yuin Y’ng Wong (22766265)

    Published 2025
    “…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”