Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
1701
-
1702
-
1703
-
1704
-
1705
-
1706
DataSheet1_An observational study of lower limb muscle imbalance assessment and gait analysis of badminton players.docx
Published 2024“…Purpose<p>The imbalance of muscle strength indicators has a negative impact on players. Lower limb muscle imbalance can cause gait abnormalities and increase the risk of muscle injury or decreased performance in significantly asymmetrical situations. …”
-
1707
-
1708
-
1709
-
1710
-
1711
-
1712
Example of sample data.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the EGA-BPNN model achieves a significantly lower mean absolute relative error of 0.41% for single-flow prediction, demonstrating superior prediction performance. …”
-
1713
Structure of BPNN.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the EGA-BPNN model achieves a significantly lower mean absolute relative error of 0.41% for single-flow prediction, demonstrating superior prediction performance. …”
-
1714
The workflow of EGA-BPNN.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the EGA-BPNN model achieves a significantly lower mean absolute relative error of 0.41% for single-flow prediction, demonstrating superior prediction performance. …”
-
1715
S1 Data -
Published 2025“…In contrast, the EGA-BPNN model achieves a significantly lower mean absolute relative error of 0.41% for single-flow prediction, demonstrating superior prediction performance. …”
-
1716
Algorithm flow of the GA-BPNN model.
Published 2025“…In contrast, the EGA-BPNN model achieves a significantly lower mean absolute relative error of 0.41% for single-flow prediction, demonstrating superior prediction performance. …”
-
1717
-
1718
-
1719
-
1720