Showing 781 - 800 results of 11,397 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (linear decrease))) OR (we decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 781
  2. 782
  3. 783
  4. 784
  5. 785
  6. 786

    Geometric manifold comparison visualization by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

    Published 2025
    “…In this work, we propose to use a generative non-linear deep learning model, a disentangled variational autoencoder (DSVAE), that factorizes out window-specific (context) information from timestep-specific (local) information. …”
  7. 787

    Hyperparameter ranges by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

    Published 2025
    “…In this work, we propose to use a generative non-linear deep learning model, a disentangled variational autoencoder (DSVAE), that factorizes out window-specific (context) information from timestep-specific (local) information. …”
  8. 788

    Convolutional vs RNN context encoder by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

    Published 2025
    “…In this work, we propose to use a generative non-linear deep learning model, a disentangled variational autoencoder (DSVAE), that factorizes out window-specific (context) information from timestep-specific (local) information. …”
  9. 789
  10. 790

    Flowchart of the study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  11. 791

    Characteristics of study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
  12. 792
  13. 793

    Sensitivity analysis. by Jiuming Li (11711375)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”
  14. 794

    Characteristics of participants. by Jiuming Li (11711375)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”
  15. 795

    Participant Flowchart. by Jiuming Li (11711375)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”
  16. 796

    Stratified analyses. by Jiuming Li (11711375)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the follow-up, 271 (56.7%) were in the exclusive breastfeeding group and the rest in the non-exclusive breastfeeding group (n = 207, 43.3%). A significant decrease in exclusive breastfeeding rate was observed in the prolonged TTP group compared to the short TTP group (OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.27–0.74). …”
  17. 797
  18. 798
  19. 799
  20. 800