Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), showed decreased (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
2121
-
2122
Achieving Improved Ion Swarm Shaping Based on Ion Leakage Control in Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Published 2025“…Simulations and experiments demonstrate that precise voltage adjustments effectively minimize ion leakage, enhancing resolving power by 50% (reaching a maximum of 106), while the corresponding decrease in signal intensity follows the <i>I</i><sub>p</sub>–<i>R</i><sub>p</sub> linear relationship. …”
-
2123
-
2124
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2125
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2126
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2127
-
2128
-
2129
-
2130
-
2131
Age-related correlation of PBMCs percentages in comparison between males and females.
Published 2024“…<p>Only cells/groups with significant p-values are shown. Additional data are presented in S1 Fig 5 in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0300946#pone.0300946.s001" target="_blank">S1 File</a>. …”
-
2132
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
2133
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
2134
-
2135
-
2136
-
2137
Sociodemographic data of the sample.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
2138
Flowchart of the study.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
2139
Bandages: KT (3A) and RT (3B).
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
2140
ANOVA repeated measures of the variables.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”