Dataset. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”

CONSORT Flow Diagram. by María García-Arrabé (21156737)

“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p =  0.045), SLDJ height (p =  0.014), flight time (p =  0.019) and ground contact time (p =  0.035). …”

The effect of feeding and starvation on the proliferative competence and onset of cell cycle re-entry in all cell cycle-gated cells. by Eudald Pascual-Carreras (12115380)

Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”

Classification of hand grip strength. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”

Rating scale for functional severity [28]. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”

Regression model coefficients. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”

ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”

WHO BMI classification for adults. by Shane Naidoo (20148021)

“…Conversely in a linear regression model, depression (<i>B</i> = -2.01, <i>p</i> = .004) and physical activity (<i>B</i> = -.001, <i>p</i> = .008) were predictors for decreases in BMI.…”

Gating strategy of experiment using 30 min EdU pulses experiments in mOr2-Piwi1 juvenile polyps. by Eudald Pascual-Carreras (12115380)

Speech material modulation spectrum and behavioral speech recognition task results. by Elena Bolt (20396190)

Characterization of Developmentally Dynamic Promoters (DDPs). by Jiang Tan (260415)

Sex- and age-related changes in individual variance and behavioural repeatability. by Andréa L. Johnson (22505376)

The Effect of Confinement on the Phase Behavior of <i>n</i>‑Pentane in Nanoporous Media: An Experimental Investigation at Varying Pore Sizes and Temperatures by Karem Al-Garadi (21156942)

“…Capillary condensation pressures increase with pore size and temperature, but suppression of saturation pressure under confinement decreases at higher temperatures and larger pore sizes. …”

Effect of imidacloprid (Im) and rutin (Ru) administration on thoracic electric currents in Africanized honey bee foragers. by Juan P. Hernández (22216133)

Data. by Michael C. Payne (2664379)

“…Similarly, semiannual MDA lowered Mf prevalence from 23.3% (CI, 21.4-25.4%) to 0.3% (CI, 0.1-0.7%). …”

Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of far UV-C irradiation for the peritonitis rat model in the hyper-acute phase. by Kosuke Sugiyama (10042051)

Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”

Results of the colorimetric MTT test. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”

IOP fluctuation. by Adela Klezlova (22608008)

“…In the study group, the IOP was statistically significantly lower by 29% at the end of the follow-up compared to the preoperative measurements (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.009). …”