Showing 1,781 - 1,800 results of 4,658 for search 'significantly ((((((lower decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (linear decrease))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 1781

    The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  2. 1782

    Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  3. 1783

    S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  4. 1784

    The mediation of confidence. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  5. 1785

    Robustness test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  6. 1786

    The effects of consumption inequality on SWB. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  7. 1787
  8. 1788

    Baseline characteristics. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  9. 1789

    Data ste. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  10. 1790

    Comparison of post-experimental outcome measures. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  11. 1791
  12. 1792
  13. 1793
  14. 1794
  15. 1795

    S1 File - by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  16. 1796

    Chicago COVID-19 mitigation policy timeline. by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  17. 1797

    Demographic and ocular features. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”
  18. 1798

    Machine learning model to diagnose PCG. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”
  19. 1799

    ROC curves of TAS + SOD + MDA to diagnose PCG. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”
  20. 1800